Thursday, November 17, 2011
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Juliet Forshaw, "Metal in Three Modes of Enmity: Political, Musical, Cosmic.”
Juliet Forshaw, “Metal in Three Modes of Enmity: Political,
Musical, Cosmic.” Current Musicology 91
(2011): 140-62.
Gerd Bayer ed. 2009. Heavy
Metal Music in Britain. Surrey, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Steve Waksman. 2009. This
Ain’t the Summer of Love: Conflict and Crossover in Heavy Metal and Punk. Berkeley
and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Nicola Masciandaro ed. 2010. Hideous Gnosis: Black Metal Theory Symposium 1. Charleston:
CreateSpace.
Reviewed by Juliet Forshaw
Scholarship
on metal always seems a little bewildered or put on the defensive by the
genre’s profoundly adversarial nature. Metal certainly opposes something, and
to a large extent is defined by this opposition rather than by any obvious
message of its own, but what exactly does it oppose? Certain political values?
Certain kinds of music? Certain belief systems? Or does it represent a vague
opposition to “things in general;” is it the music of rebellion without a
cause? The short answer, judging by the academic treatments under review here
as well as earlier attempts to censor it, is that it opposes whatever its
interpreters want it to. Thus its critics cite accusations of racism, sexism,
and homophobia, while supporters praise its supposed opposition to capitalism,
strict gender roles, and even the concept of order itself. Many of these metal
partisans, especially those whose primary concern is the rehabilitation of an
art form often perceived as ethically problematic, spend so much time
explaining away its disturbing features that they ignore the possibility that
disturbance is precisely the point. Even those who do recognize disturbance as
a fundamental aim of metal and call attention to the specific forms that that
disturbance takes, such as expressions of animosity toward certain groups of
people, often fail to explain why listeners are attracted to these sounds. That
the appeal doesn’t lie only in bigotry is clear from the growing number of fans
who come from the very groups that have been the most stigmatized in
metal—women, ethnic minorities, religiously observant people, and queer women
and men.
The
following essay will not fully explain either the genre’s lust for enmity in
all forms or the perverse attraction that this spirit of antagonism holds for
fans, but it will at least review current scholarly thought on these subjects
and suggest some possible avenues for future exploration. I will provide a
brief overview of the scholarship that first legitimized the study of metal and
consider three recent books that each turn the notion of metal’s enmity toward
other things into an analytical methodology; that is, they attempt to define it
by what it is not and by what it opposes. The books cast metal in opposition to
certain political values, kinds of music, and religious/philosophical
worldviews. Out of our discussion—imbued with the recognition that metal exists
only in opposition, enmity, and negativity toward something else—will emerge a
sense of the elusiveness of this art form as a subject of inquiry and the
difficulty of finding a methodological approach that fully captures its
strangeness, darkness, and hostility toward analysis.
Metal’s
transmission from the stage to the page began with lurid biographies and
autobiographies of performers, which continue to be churned out by both
mainstream and, increasingly, vanity presses. Like other popular music genres,
it entered the academy under the aegis of sociology rather than musicology,
since the validation of a set of sounds as music worthy of study cannot occur
until the people who create and consume them are taken seriously. The early
work of sociologists Donna Gaines and Deena Weinstein in Teenage Wasteland:
Suburbia’s Dead End Kids (1991) and Heavy Metal: A Cultural Sociology (1991)
thus painted a sympathetic portrait of the typical disaffected, middle-to-lower
class, white teenage male fan who had so alarmed adult elites that in 1985 a
bipartisan committee founded the infamous Parents Music Resource Center in an
attempt to censor metal (as well as hip hop and some pop) for their supposedly
damaging effect on the morals of American youth. These works represent the
beginning of a sustained sociological and ethnographic interest in metal, an
interest that so far has outstripped that of musicologists.
The
first and still definitive musicological treatment, Robert Walser’s Running
With the Devil: Power, Gender, and Madness in Heavy Metal Music (1993),
walked the line between justification and critique as gracefully as was
possible in the charged rhetorical climate that surrounded metal in the early
nineties. Walser accomplished this by analyzing metal with the then-fashionable
and still effective “new musicology” approach, which postulates that ideology
is encoded in the very structure of the music. Although Walser at times makes
overly definitive pronouncements about the “meaning” of tiny musical gestures,
his basic claims remain compelling: high volume and distortion reflect a
general preoccupation with power and intensity; the virtuosic guitar solos that
explode out of conventional verse-chorus structure reflect general values of
assertiveness and rebellion; the reliance on the Aeolian and Phrygian modes
reflect a focus on negative emotion. The book also raised the crucial issue of
metal performers’ and fans’ masculinity, calling attention to the genre’s
curious combination of macho swagger and effeminate visuals. Eighties glam
metal, he argues, engaged in a subversion of traditional gender roles whereby
male musicians adopted traits of sexually provocative women’s dress and
performance (such as long teased hair, elaborate makeup, and sinuous dance
moves) in order to question conventional masculine norms.
Yet
though his argument has merit, I would contend that this aesthetic wasn’t as
androgynous and benign as Walser makes it sound. In some ways, it deconstructed
masculinity only to reconstruct it more solidly than ever: it was not a
wholesale rejection of masculine values or an espousal of feminine ones, but an
adoption of the superficial trappings of sexualized femininity as a means of
dramatizing a preference for a certain kind of objectified woman (the stripper
or groupie, endlessly celebrated by Mötley Crüe, Guns N’ Roses, and others).
Though Walser is sensitive to the ways in which metal musicians recapitulate
broader sexist discourses, the book’s gender-deconstruction argument risks
casting metal in a “progressive” light, as a force that was on what academics
tend to consider the good side of the culture wars. Walser generally reined in
the impulse to whitewash, but his successors have not always been so nuanced.
Whatever
claims to progressiveness attributed to metal during its glam phase were
negated with the rise of extreme metal (an umbrella term that includes abrasive
subgenres such as thrash metal, death metal, and black metal). When death metal
bands such as Cannibal Corpse began singing about the pleasures of torture and
the early 1990s Norwegian black metal scene exploded in real-life murderous
violence, it seemed that Walser’s book had come along at exactly the wrong
time: just when he, along with Gaines and Weinstein, had validated metal within
the academy, the genre found new ways to appall. As earlier heavy metal became
assimilated into the musical and intellectual mainstream, extreme metal arose
as a defiant response to such co-option and began its perpetual quest for what
Georges Bataille called the “extreme limit,” a state of such intensity,
irrationality, and unacceptability that no conventional discourse could ever
hope to pin it down.
Perhaps
because extreme metal still bears this aura of incomprehensibility and bad
taste, the majority of recent scholarship has continued to focus on music from
the ’70s and ’80s, which has lost much of its shock value and can readily be
assimilated through conventional approaches. The first book under review, Gerd
Bayer’s edited collection of essays Heavy Metal Music in Britain,
focuses on the New Wave of British Heavy Metal (NWOBHM), which arose in the
wake of Black Sabbath and included bands such as Judas Priest, Iron Maiden,
Motörhead, Def Leppard, and Venom. The tremendous problem facing anyone who
wants to write a book about the NWOBHM is that the genre encompassed too many
different musical styles and lyrical preoccupations to allow for many valid generalizations
about it on the whole (though some of these writers go ahead and generalize
anyway). The bands that are grouped under the NWOBHM umbrella today share
little more than their emergence in the late 1970s, their British working-class
background, and their visual aesthetic of long hair and a denim and leather
wardrobe. Otherwise, they range from the Satanist proto-black metal of Venom to
the glam party-rock of Def Leppard. Given the diffuse nature of the movement’s
music and lyrical concerns, almost the only thing that can be generalized about
is its politics—and indeed, many of the contributors focus on that topic,
trying their best to position metal as politically progressive by placing it in
opposition to misogyny and working-class oppression. These essays portray metal
in what might be called the “political” mode of enmity, and illustrate the
first of the three methodological approaches reviewed here.
One
valuable as well as problematic essay that exemplifies the book’s strong desire
to rehabilitate metal comes from Deena Weinstein, who in “The Empowering
Masculinity of British Heavy Metal” pursues the theme of constructed
masculinity, arguing that the NWOBHM (narrowly represented by Iron Maiden and
Judas Priest) was no more misogynistic than mainstream rock, despite metal’s
unsavory reputation. As a backdrop to her argument, I would point out that
British metal does share certain masculinist attitudes that inform much rock
music production, such as the belief that rock expresses a male sensibility and
should be confrontational in a specifically masculine way. “Rock music should
be gross: that’s the fun of it and its attraction,” says Bruce Dickinson of
Iron Maiden. “It gets up and drops its trousers. Not everybody wants to be
Sinéad O’Connor all the time” (in Jeffries 1991). In keeping with the
stereotype of confrontation as a male behavioral strategy and conciliation as a
female one, those who adhere to rock’s code of authenticity shun the
euphonious, soothing sounds associated with pop music written by or at least
for women and instead cultivate a harsh, raucous style. Insofar as British
metal musicians embrace Dickinson’s belligerent definition of rock, they
support the dominant narrative of popular music, which champions rock and its
subgenres as a male discursive space.
But,
with this aside, the most striking thing about the NWOBHM’s attempts to
construct masculinity, as Weinstein points out, is how little its conception of
masculinity is predicated on the overt sexism of denigrating or objectifying
women, in contrast to many American bands from the same period such as Mötley
Crüe and Guns N’ Roses. Rather, it more or less ignores women and attempts
instead to depict and impart a type of power that valorizes certain
characteristics that happen to be widely perceived as masculine, such as
strength, boldness, and energy. Weinstein doesn’t sufficiently consider the
negative implications of this erasure of women from metal discourse, and her
argument would have been more complete if she had explored the few but salient
instances of disparagement of women in these bands’ back catalogs. Her
approving mention of Nietzsche as the philosophical precursor of British heavy
metal is particularly troubling, since his entire edifice was explicitly
predicated on contempt for women (much more so than British metal, in fact).
Nevertheless, the essay is groundbreaking because it advances the overdue
thesis that the NWOBHM’s preoccupation with a masculine-derived ideal of
athletic physical power is not in and of itself pernicious to women; indeed,
female fans may even experience it as empowering. After all, many women share
the common male desire to feel powerful in the culturally masculine sense of
having athletic prowess. Although heavy metal’s celebration of adrenaline-infused
power is derived from an ideal of masculine physicality, this power, once
translated into music, can be appropriated by female as well as male fans.
But
why, one might ask, is heavy metal obsessed with feeling powerful in the first
place? Many of the essays in this book argue that the feeling of potency is
sought as a tool with which to overcome the economic oppression that lurks
around the corner in this music, created as it was by men who identified
strongly with the working class. The authors do not, however, anticipate the
dark side of this quest for power, which would only become obvious with the
rise of extreme metal: power can also be used to assert mastery over others and
engage in oppression oneself. The NWOBHM gives us a foretaste of this trend in
songs like Judas Priest’s “Electric Eye,” in which the narrator takes on the
identity of an omnipotent governmental entity that is watching its victims’
every move. Depiction of, and perhaps identification with, the imagination of
the oppressor would henceforth become one of metal’s most common tropes.
The
theme of oppression gets more sustained treatment in Ryan H. Moore’s excellent
essay “The Unmaking of the English Working Class: Deindustrialization,
Reification and the Origins of Heavy Metal,” a downbeat look at the ways in
which British metal’s fantastic and supposedly escapist lyrics express
working-class frustration—but failed to mobilize its fans to political action.
Drawing on Lukács’ development of Marx’s concept of reification, he argues that
the decline of the British manufacturing sector in the 1970s and ’80s left the
working class with a sense that they were at the mercy of impersonal social
forces beyond their comprehension or control: “They knew they were screwed, but
it was hard to articulate why” (156). Heavy metal reifies these forces into
mysterious, supernatural beings that perpetrate violence and cannot be resisted
through conventional (i.e. political) means. Instead, metal seeks to empower
its fans through the ritual evocation of magical energies that can be used to
resist these “superhuman” oppressors. The indirectness (and, for Moore,
ineffectiveness) of this strategy “expresses a mystification of power
relations, a general sense of confusion about how social power subjugates young
people and the working-class and how exploited peoples can take power and
resist their exploiters” (148).
Other
contributors to this volume, including Magnus Nilsson and Laura Wiebe Taylor,
see more potential for real resistance, but given that the major NWOBHM bands
have all spread far beyond their initial working-class fanbase and are near the
end of their careers with no successors who particularly identify with the
working class, it seems unlikely that this musical culture will play a major
role in any revitalization of the labor movement. If anything, the worldwide
success of bands such as Iron Maiden and Black Sabbath, which cuts across all
class boundaries, suggests that their visions of dystopia and magical
resistance are appealing primarily for other reasons besides that of class-consciousness.
Instead of trying to mobilize the music of thirty-year-old bands for current
political causes, it might be worthwhile to explore why else fans are drawn to
occult imagery and representations of violence.
One
thing that fans might be getting out of this sinister music is the rare
opportunity to fantasize about an unacceptable scenario and find a perverse
delight in it. (See Iron Maiden’s “The Number Of The Beast,” in which the
narrator dreads being possessed by the devil but gradually succumbs, against
his will, to the attractiveness of the idea and ends by singing as the devil.)
None of the contributors to this book explore such dark psychological terrain,
though at least the topic of dystopian fantasy gets treated in Taylor’s “Images
of Human-Wrought Despair and Destruction: social critique in British
apocalyptic and dystopian metal,” which links the genre with the culture of
sci-fi dystopian literature and movies. Bands such as Black Sabbath and Judas
Priest critique various aspects of modern society, including surveillance,
war, mechanization, social conformity, and totalitarianism: they create visions
of despair and destruction, pointing out problems but rarely offering
solutions. This has frequently led to the charge that their music is
nihilistic; however, the depiction of dystopia is useful in that it may
motivate people to change what they don’t like about the world. Furthermore,
within the overall narrative of nihilism, there are counter-messages of
“defiance and hope” (93) such as the guitar solos that Walser analyzed as a
rebellion against the claustrophobic confines and depressing lyrics of the
verses and refrains. Again, working-class frustration is an unspoken motivator
for these dystopian fantasies, but for this reviewer the essay still tries too
hard to cast metal as a progressive force, as a genre that critiques violence
and oppression rather than reveling in them as sources of intense sensation. I
can’t help thinking, for example, that the infectious refrain of “Electric Eye”
and Rob Halford’s masterful performance of it, which sets him up as a rock
star/government surveillance agent observing and manipulating an adoring crowd,
expresses as much a gleeful fascination with totalitarian power as disapproval
of it.
Because
none of the contributors to Heavy Metal are music scholars, they
generally locate a given song’s ideas or “message” in the lyrics and avoid
engaging with the actual sound of the music as a locus of meaning. This book is
symptomatic of the reality that metal has drawn much more attention from fields
outside of music scholarship. Scholars from a variety of disciplines are
interested in metal culture, lyrical tropes, political content, and
philosophical ideas, but few musicologists have taken it upon themselves to
contribute their expertise to these discussions. That is what makes Steve
Waksman’s This Ain’t the Summer of Love: Conflict and Crossover in Heavy
Metal and Punk so refreshing, as it is full of lucid and lively descriptions
of musical sound and structure. Although Walser and other formally trained
musicologists such as Esa Lilja have discussed metal’s harmony, melody, and
form, and Glenn Pillsbury has tackled its rhythm, the field has only begun to
explore metal’s most striking feature—timbre. Waksman has already explored
timbre in the more general context of rock in Instruments of Desire: The
Electric Guitar and the Shaping of Musical Experience (1999), a critical
organology of the electric guitar that deals with technology, industrial
practice, marketing, and musicians as part of the evolution of the instrument.
In This Ain’t the Summer of Love, his concise and not excessively
technical analysis sheds light on particular types and degrees of sonic
distortion. For example, on doom metal band Trouble’s “Psychotic Reaction” he
writes, “The opening riff is a rather stock pentatonic figure in F-sharp,
played in the lower midrange of the guitar, that derives its propulsion from the
sharp, treble-laden quality of the fuzz” (61). This timbre-centric approach
holds exciting possibilities for the study of all metal, especially extreme
metal (though Waksman’s book doesn’t go deep into that territory, ending as it
does with Metallica, Venom and the alt-rock revolution), because as guitars
became increasingly downtuned and/or lo-fi in the 1990s, melody and harmony and
pitch itself became increasingly difficult to detect through the registral
extremes and sheer timbral complexity of the music. Traditional melodic and
harmonic analysis of this more distorted music would probably be less useful
than an analysis that emphasized timbre.
This
Ain’t The Summer of Love is also innovative in its approach to
the idea of metal as a genre. Rather than seeing it as simply an outgrowth of
hard rock with a sprinkling of Baroque sequences and Romantic virtuosity (the
Walser narrative, which is true as far as it goes), Waksman portrays it as
being defined at almost every stage of its development through its conflict
with punk (and vice versa). The book captures metal in what might be called the
“musical” mode of enmity and provides a more balanced and historically aware
approach than the strained efforts of Bayer et al. to reclaim metal for the
current political left. Entire books remain to be written about metal’s
antagonistic relationship with other musical genres, such as pop and especially
African American-derived musics. The violence of the metal-punk conflict is
brilliantly captured in the opening of the This Ain’t the Summer of Love,
which details an exchange between fans of each genre that was published in the
Letters to the Editor section of several issues of Creem magazine in
1980, in which each side repeatedly hurled homophobic slurs at the other. Waksman
is sensitive to the ways in which this conflict of genres intersected with a
contest over “authentic” masculinity: at stake was not simply musical style,
but male fans’ sense of how their musical preferences reflected and
established their own masculine identity. The heavy investment of both of these
genres in the performance of masculinity has tended to result in the
marginalization of female performers—a marginalization replicated in genre
histories. Given the lack of scholarship on these performers, the extensive
discussion of the all-female band the Runaways in chapter three is particularly
welcome. Like much of metal, theirs is a story of disintegration and
irreconcilable opposing forces: caught between Joan Jett’s stripped-down,
punk-style rhythm guitar and Lita Ford’s virtuosic metal lead guitar, between
the demand to embody a heretofore masculine brand of rebellious self-assertion
and the opposing demand to embody feminine sexual tractability, the Runaways’
career demonstrates the pitfalls of blurring genre and gender roles. Neither
fish nor fowl, they fizzled.
If
other bands more successfully navigated the no-man’s-land (and certainly
no-woman’s-land) between punk and metal, many of them have nevertheless largely
been excluded from scholarly treatments of either genre because they don’t
quite fit either one. This book sets out to reclaim them. What emerges is an
alternate history of an altogether new genre, punk-metal crossover, which has
its own canon: Grand Funk Railroad instead of Led Zeppelin, the Dictators and
the Runaways instead of the Sex Pistols, Mötorhead and Venom instead of Judas
Priest. This approach also forces the reader to rethink assumptions about bands
that are widely thought of today as more or less definitively metal or punk (or
something else): the Stooges, Iron Maiden, Black Flag, Metallica, and Nirvana
are here re-conceptualized as punk-metal crossovers—as indeed they were
perceived at certain points in their careers, according to the numerous rock
journalism primary sources that Waksman cites. The book superbly illustrates
the limitations of conventional genre histories and the opportunities that
arise when one deconstructs them. The fact that new paradigms and genre
designations emerge from this process should be no deterrent.
If
these bands initially occupied a middle ground between punk and metal, who
decided to classify them definitively as one or the other? Not the artists
themselves. As many writers have observed, generic designations are more useful
to the music industry than to performers. In this case, the distinction between
metal and punk was largely created by music critics and marketing by
independent record labels such as SST, Metal Blade, and Sub Pop. All of these
labels produced music that could be heard as either metal or punk but would
come to be characterized by the press and listening publics as completely
different genres. SST was associated with early hardcore acts such as Black
Flag; Metal Blade supplied hardcore-influenced thrash and speed metal such as
Metallica and Slayer; Sub Pop purveyed the “Seattle sound” of bands such as
Soundgarden. Though these independent labels were more dependent on the
mainstream music industry than their founders would likely admit, they played a
crucial role in marketing regional “sounds” that were initially ignored by the
larger industry, and would later crystallize into widely popular genres: for
example, the “Seattle sound,” which became grunge. This kind of attention to
record labels and their role as tastemakers is long overdue in musicology,
which has tended to focus on metal musicians and fans but not on the industry
that mediates between them.
The
book unfolds chronologically as a series of focused case studies of bands and
labels ranging from the late 1970s to the early 1990s. (One can only hope that
Waksman will write a follow up book about the 1990s and 2000s flourishing of
punk-metal crossover genres such as grindcore and metalcore). Each case study
discusses not only musical style, but also reception by critics and the
experience of live concerts. The focus on live concerts is particularly
gratifying insofar as metal and punk foreground the live show as the most
immediate way of experiencing the music and the community associated with it.
Several of the bands featured here fundamentally changed the dynamics of
performance and interaction with the audience, as well as audience expectations
about performers’ images. Thus we read about how Grand Funk Railroad rejected
the highbrow, virtuosic tendencies of ’70s rock and created their own brand of
lowest-common-denominator arena rock, in which the performers are seen less as
“shamans” and more as “pals” (46), how Alice Cooper and especially the Stooges
reacted against GFR’s feel-good ethos with their antagonistic stage personas,
how the Runaways tapped into nostalgia for a more youth-centered rock culture
and in doing so created a new rocker image of the teenage girl gone bad, how
Metallica’s faster and more percussive style led to the culture of
head-banging, and how peripheral exposure to metal and punk shaped consumer
tastes so as to facilitate the commercial explosion of grunge, which “was at
once inviting and exclusive; it generated a sense of mass belonging that hinged
on its capacity for highlighting the expressive force of anger and
introspection” (301).
These
discussions reveal the tension in both genres between the desire for
individuality, as expressed through virtuosity and flamboyant stage personas,
and the desire for loss of self within the collective, as expressed through the
communal nature of live performance, the stripping away of virtuosity, and the
phenomenon of noise itself. Waksman rather philosophically describes it as a
“simultaneous drive toward differentiation and unity . . . The desire for
belonging in rock has continually been set against the longing to be set apart”
(307). The conflict between these desires would only sharpen with extreme
metal; it is one of the main themes of the final book reviewed here, Nicola
Masciandaro’s volume of edited essays, Hideous Gnosis, the product of a
whimsical conference/ritual that took place—with me in attendance—in Brooklyn’s
frosty, dark bar, Public Assembly, in November 2009.
It
was a small gathering of black-clad academics, many of them from the UK, who
knew each other already from the English department circuit and previous metal
conferences. They had a bashful and eager air, as though they felt the whole
business was a little harebrained but nevertheless happy occasion, a meeting of
minds. I made the acquaintance of one of the few non-academics there, a fiction
writer who had seen a flyer and thought that something called “Hideous Gnosis”
might provide good material for a story.
The
history of black metal is stranger than fiction. An obscure subgenre of extreme
metal that began mostly in Scandinavia in the late 1980s, it was launched into
the wider metal community and briefly into public consciousness in the early
1990s after a spate of suicides, church burnings, and murders within the scene.
The most notorious of these musicians is Varg Vikernes, of the one-man band
Burzum, who was convicted of arson and murder and became something of a martyr
figure, which in turn inspired many others to take up his brand of lo-fi,
despairing, misanthropic music. His racist statements made from within prison
have aroused even more ire than his crimes, but in the end they too are part of
his appeal for some fans, and the genre that arose in his wake has continued to
traffic in themes of nationalism, fascism, and racism. Black metal is thus
forbidding even by the standards of extreme metal, and those who expect to walk
away from reading Hideous Gnosis with a tidy summary of the genre’s
great issues will likely be disappointed. The goal (and effect) of the essays
is not so much to shed light on their subject as to plunge it into even greater
darkness; that is, to suggest that black metal is far more complex, conflicted,
and philosophically rich than many of its detractors—and, more importantly, its
fans and creators—realize. The purpose is not to “‘address’ or ‘solve’ [these
puzzles], but to intensify and exacerbate [them] . . . to bask in the
speculative glory of the problematic” (267). One result of this desire to
problematize rather than solve is that the essays themselves read more like
lyrical perorations or choleric manifestos than typical examples of
contemporary scholarship. Yet somehow, more than most other academic treatments
of metal, this artfully messy volume finds a discourse that productively
engages with a genre that resists discourse.
Perhaps
even more than other metal subgenres, black metal is predicated on an
opposition to whatever its practitioners see as the prevailing order or
worldview of the day as articulated by public institutions such as governments
and churches. But because opposition works through inversion and reversal, this
means that black metal remains formally dependent on that which it is opposing,
much as a Satanist Black Mass of the nineteenth century inversely replicated
the Catholic mass in all particulars. The prevailing order that black metal
most famously combated in its early stages was that of Christianity, but
although the genre earned a reputation for being satanic, in many ways it
remained dependent on Christian thought, ritual, aesthetics, and strategies.
Thus Erik Butler’s “The Counter-Reformation in Stone and Metal: Spiritual
Substances” calls attention to various morphological similarities between black
metal and Reformation-era Roman Catholicism, including the genre’s revival of what
its practitioners saw as the purity, rigor, asceticism, and orthodoxy of early
metal in the face of the perceived heresy of commodified, mainstream ’80s
metal.
Butler
raises many points that would benefit from further exploration. For instance,
how and why did this morphologically Catholic art form arise in Scandinavia,
which is overwhelmingly secular/Protestant? The appeal of Catholicism for black
metal musicians certainly doesn’t lie in its doctrines. Might it lie in the
Catholic Church’s “irrational” taste for mysticism and elaborate, grisly
rituals of sacrifice, which contrast sharply with both institutionalized
Protestantism and the post-Enlightenment rational worldview that together
undergird modern European society? A metal concert is nothing if not a gory
ritual, and it may be that black metal musicians find the Church—one of the
most uncompromisingly old-fashioned institutions of our time—a treasure trove
of aesthetic strategies for their own revolt against modern society. Even while
decrying its beliefs and praising the devil, they have embraced its trappings,
positioning themselves in opposition to rational, secular modernity through a
ritual, Satanist appropriation of Catholicism. In this connection, can other
aspects of black metal be related to Catholic praxis? For example, can black
metal’s aestheticization of pain as a means of giving the listener a sense of
communion with cosmic forces be linked to the Catholic tradition of meditation
on intense pain as a means of communing with God? Finally, to what extent is
black metal still dependent on Catholic or broader Christian modes of thought?
Many of the essays, including Aspasia Stephanou’s “Playing Wolves and Red
Riding Hoods in Black Metal” and Niall Scott’s “Black Confessions and Absu-lution,”
suggest that Christianity is still a primary force that the genre opposes and
relies on, while others, such as Joseph Russo’s “Perpetue Putesco—Perpetually I
Putrefy” argue that some black metal has outgrown both its opposition to and
aesthetic dependence on Christianity.
If
Christianity represents (or represented) a prevailing order that must be
combated and exploited, another prevailing order that black metal often opposes
yet benefits from is political: the modern democratic nation-state. This book’s
discussion of what, for many, is the hot-button issue of black metal—its
fixation on fascism—raises more questions than it answers. No one has ever
explained to the satisfaction of outsiders exactly why black metallers are so
drawn to fascism and, in some cases, racism, and why the genre rose to
prominence in Norway, a country whose socialist trappings, in the form of
generous unemployment benefits, are precisely what gave these musicians the
leisure to create their music in the first place. In this sense, National
Socialist black metal is often also an unacknowledged Social Democratic black
metal, as sociologist Asbjørn Dyrendal has quipped (in Kahn-Harris 2007:2).
Certainly many Norwegians (and not just black metallers) are angered at the
growing number of ethnically diverse immigrants, but fascism would seem a poor
solution for these musicians, if only because a fascist regime would likely
have less tolerance than the current democratic one for their unpopular art
form.
Scholarly
discussion of this puzzlingly self-destructive fascist impulse, when it appears
at all, often merely describes the far-right rhetoric of individual musicians
without exploring its connection to their music, its relevance to the scene as
a whole, or its links to larger social forces. The first trade book on black
metal, Lords of Chaos: The Bloody Rise of the Satanic Metal Underground (1998),
features several interviews on the subject but provides little in the way of
critical perspective or explanation. Early scholarship might be forgiven for
not addressing every factor in black metal’s emergence and every facet of its
ideological underpinnings, but the inability or reluctance to engage with the
genre’s politics continues to this day. See, for example, Until the Light
Takes Us (2009), a documentary which features numerous interviews with
black metal’s founding fathers, including Varg Vikernes. The film pointedly
avoids difficult questions, instead allowing Vikernes to hold forth on less
incendiary subjects such as the evils of globalism and his interest in Nordic
paganism.
Hideous
Gnosis makes a more sustained attempt to explain the appeal of
fascism. Most of the contributions touch on the ways in which black metal
represents a rejection of modern life, including mass consumption and the
apparent leveling of social hierarchies that together have resulted in what
black metallers see as a culture of undifferentiated mass mediocrity. Benjamin
Noys in “Remain True to the Earth: Remarks on the Politics of Black Metal”
relates black metal’s fascist tendencies to Nietzsche’s grand politics, which
some have interpreted as championing dominance by an aristocracy of supermen,
and Carl Schmitt’s theory of the partisan or insurgent, which champions a type
of fighter who fights not for one abstract ideology against another abstract
ideology, but for his land against those who would take his land (in Nietzsche
1968 and Schmitt 2007). This type of fighter remains “grounded”; he knows
exactly what he stands for and what his enemy stands for. Black metallers,
according to Noys, are drawn to the romantic nationalism of the warrior
fighting for his land because this imagery gives them a way to define their
nebulous enemy, which, for Noys, is mainly advanced capitalism (but depending
on the band one might also suggest the modern liberal-democratic state,
Christianity, multiculturalism, and cosmic order) as clear-cut opponents—as
Others; in turn, defining their enemies gives them a clearer sense of their own
selves.
The
fascination with such an anachronistic theme and the idealization of the
ancient past at the expense of the (disappointing) present suggests that black
metal is a form of reactionary cultural expression akin to many strains of
political conservatism which, dismissive of the liberal attitudes toward
economics and social questions that gained traction in the late twentieth
century, seek inspiration for future policies in a distant, idealized past. In
this regard, I would add that black metal is only an extreme instance of a more
general turn to a mythologized past in metal. Most subgenres of metal contain
significant conservative proclivities despite their origins in the working
class. This would explain why British heavy metal didn’t inspire its fans to
progressive political action, to the dismay of the contributors to Heavy
Metal Music in Britain. It is no coincidence that metal arose in the era of
deindustrialization and affirmative action, when many working-class white men,
who along with other white men had been relatively dominant in their professions,
began to feel increasingly imperiled by the need to compete with more
contenders from other demographics for fewer and fewer jobs. The heroic
representative of a dying tradition who fights various Others could seem an
appealing if misguided metaphor for people in this position.
But,
Noys argues, black metal doesn’t just define and attempt to vanquish its enemy;
it also attempts, through combat with the enemy, an ambitious redefinition or
transformation of the self. (After all, one can’t become a glorious
superman-warrior without an opponent.) This strategy is ultimately
self-defeating, since the genre’s enemies are ideological and thus always
changing. Constantly evolving past tidy definitions, these elusively abstract
opponents refuse to give black metallers the sure sense of self that they
crave. Yet the musicians (or rather their fictional avatars in their songs)
fight on, with no sign of victory, as their enemies will not disappear any time
soon. It is as though the most important thing for them were the struggle
itself, not victory as such. In fact, they know they are doomed; albums
frequently end with the implied death or subjection of the narrator at the
hands of undefined cosmic forces. For Noys, the futility of this struggle does
not detract from the aesthetic power of black metal, but rather enhances it by
dramatizing its core principles of opposition for its own sake and willingness
to put the self as well as others at risk. The extent to which black metal
violence is directed against the self has not been so remarked upon in the
press, which has focused on musicians’ crimes against other people, but I
should note that the movement has been associated as much with its practitioners’
self-mutilation and suicide as with assaults on others (Moynihan and Søderlind,
45–62).
A
similar logic of aesthetically enriching failure emerges from Aspasia
Stephanou’s “Playing Wolves and Red Riding Hoods in Black Metal,” which
considers the efforts of female black metal musicians to carve out a space for
themselves in the genre and concludes that in their opposition they succumb,
willy-nilly, to the dictates of masculine discourse: they must adopt their male
counterparts’ masculine behavior (which for Stephanou is a capitulation, not a
victorious annexation of masculinity à la Judith Halberstam in Female
Masculinity), over-sexualize themselves, or retreat behind masks into inaccessibility.
Yet these tactics do not lessen their artistic achievement. Rather, as with
black metal created by men, it is precisely the distortion or loss of the self
in the face of overwhelming forces that is the source of the genre’s appeal.
Stephanou’s essay can usefully be compared with Waksman’s discussion of the
Runaways; both imply that women’s sense of self is constantly undermined by the
conflict between the demand to compete with men on male terms and the demand to
be feminine, where femininity, too, is defined by men. What is peculiarly
fascinating about black metal is that its male performers willingly submit to a
similar disintegration of the self.
Evan
Calder Williams also considers the implications of dismantling the self in “The
Headless Horsemen of the Apocalypse,” but his reading emphasizes less the loss
implicit in this sacrifice than the possibility of reincarnation in new,
different, more interesting forms. Contra Noys, who views black metal as
basically an egocentric enterprise, Calder Williams explores the equally strong
collectivist strain in black metal, which continually evokes hordes, armies,
and packs of wolves but rarely a leader. Insofar as there are leaders, they
seem to be mysterious, collective beings drawn from the essences of many
different individuals, as in the title of Emperor’s song “I Am The Black
Wizards.” Though Williams avoids drawing any definite political conclusions
from this, he clearly sees black metal as embodying a desire for intense,
continuous transformation of the self and the community, too unstable to
endorse a leader or harden into a well-defined fascism or indeed any political
program. This notion is borne out, or at least superficially supported, by
leading black metal figures’ frequent claims that they don’t care about
politics and their tendency to undercut their own pro-fascist rhetoric, as when
Vikernes said years later of his bigoted prison manifesto that it “was written
in anger, while I was young and on isolation [sic]” (Vikernes 2004).
However,
the fact that black metal doesn’t endorse a specific political program should
not lull fans into dismissing this coy, self-subverting, fascist-leaning
political apathy as innocuous. Claims of political detachment on the part of
cultural elites are misleading insofar as they function as part of the
performance of power: it’s easy to declare your indifference to politics if the
status quo benefits you. Because certain dominant groups, such as white men,
are better served by the status quo than other groups, they have the privilege
of not caring (or seeming not to care) about politics. And even if black metal
musicians are as politically apathetic or amorphous as they claim, not all of
their fans are and promoters are: for example, the American label Resistance
Records, owned by the white separatist National Alliance, produces and sells
black metal along with more overtly neo-Nazi music. Williams’ argument is
reminiscent of other attempts to reclaim metal for the left—not for labor as in
the case of Heavy Metal Music in Britain, but perhaps for anarchism. It
is not altogether compelling as a frame for thinking about Scandinavian black
metal, but, as we will see below, it may be more accurate if applied to black
metal in America.
What
remains unaddressed in the collection is racism, and this is symptomatic of
metal studies as a whole. Scholars’ avoidance of the topic of racism is a
particularly grave oversight in the case of black metal, considering such clear
indicators as Vikernes’ vocal support of eugenics and racial separatism and the
inflammatory statement on the cover of the foundational band Darkthrone’s album
Transilvanian Hunger, which translates as “Norwegian Aryan Black Metal.”
Given current xenophobic tendencies in many black metal scenes around the world
(perhaps most openly on display in the jingoist lyrics of French band Peste
Noire’s album Ballade cuntre lo Anemi Francor), which indicate that the
problem is not limited to a small cabal of Norwegian musicians, it is important
that future scholarship in this nascent field address the issue. Questions that
need to be answered include: To what extent do the genre’s notoriously abstruse
lyrics camouflage racist sentiments, and can the average fan hear them through
the screaming and language barriers? Why do many fans shrug at the imputations
of racism and brush them off as irrelevant to their experience of the music?
How do black metal’s non-white fans relate to and contextualize this music?
Where are, and how powerful are, the voices within the scene that oppose
racism? To what extent is racist posturing a marketing ploy designed to
capitalize on shock value, and has it aided or hindered the commercial success
of this music among its target audience? Given that black metal musicians
frequently dismiss all of humanity (including their own countrymen and
sometimes even their own fans) as worthless, to what extent are their racist
statements part of a bigger misanthropic puzzle? Vikernes recently implied
something of the sort:
I am a narrow-minded ultra-conservative anti-religious
misanthropic and arrogant bigot, alright, and I have a problem with just about
everything and everyone in this world, but I am not demented, and if those who
are not like me are able to enjoy my music that is all fine by me. Be a
Christian-born black gay feminist converted to Judaism for all I care, or
worse; a Muslim. Just stay off my lawn. Oh, and I may add that I have a problem
with most Nordic heterosexuals with a Pagan ideology as well. (Stosuy 2010)
As a caveat to Vikernes’ statement, it is necessary to
point out that even misanthropes usually hate some people more than others
rather than subscribing to equal-opportunity misanthropy. There are no
recorded instances of racially motivated crimes—although this may merely be a
matter of lack of opportunity—by black metal musicians, as far as I am aware,
but a plethora of crimes against churches, fellow musicians, gay men, and the
perpetrators themselves (Moynihan and Søderlind, 45-62, 81–144). This raises
the question: what group, if any, is the main target of black metal hatred?
Perhaps
because such questions are so difficult to answer, and perhaps because the
contributors to Hideous Gnosis are more interested in the genre’s
esoterically mystical possibilities for the lone individual than its observable
social manifestations, most of the essays avoid political discussions and focus
instead on the intensely introverted and private experiences that some black
metal conjures up. One experience that is commonly evoked in songs is the sense
of dismantlement and transformation of the individual self by natural or
supernatural forces such as decay and demonic possession. The lyrics often
describe experiences of extreme cold, heat, or pain which the human self cannot
endure. Anthony Sciscione in the Victor Turner-inflected “Goatsteps Behind
My Steps . . .Black Metal and Ritual Renewal” suggests that black metal’s
interest in unbearable physical experiences and in the consequent breakdown of
the self is:
motivated by a dissatisfaction with medial states and a
manifest lust for the intensity of transitions, of ceding . . . to a radical
alterity that reconfigures identity by destroying and overtaking . . . [The
black metaller] undergoes a sacrificial demise in order to open himself up as a
habitat for and an expression of the power of the demon. (176)
The theme of demonic possession gets further treatment in
Eugene Thacker’s “Three Questions on Demonology,” which argues that the demon
in black metal, while sometimes a stand-in for Satan or pagan deities, is
primarily a symbol of impersonal cosmic forces which act on humans but can
never really be understood by them. Songs about demonic possession, then, allow
us to imagine a state of being at the limits of rational knowledge, or even
being overtaken by a non-human point of view. This is the most fundamental
theme of the book: black metal is concerned with the extreme limits of human
experience and thought; it attempts a topography of the unknowable, an anatomy
of the non-human.
If black metal is all about destruction—of traditional
religion, of modern civilization, of rational thought, of the human, of the
self—then where do you go after you have destroyed everything? One answer is
offered in “Transcendental Black Metal: A Vision of Apocalyptic Humanism” by
Hunter Hunt-Hendrix, frontman of the New York-based band Liturgy and graduate
of Columbia University. Hendrix believes that Scandinavian black metal was only
the first, primitive phase of the genre, and he wishes to inaugurate the second
phase, American black metal, which he also terms “transcendental” in a nod to
Emerson and Thoreau. In contrast to the nihilistic, nocturnal, hermetic,
depraved, and misanthropic Scandinavian black metal, the new black metal is to
be affirmative, solar, courageous, open, and loving (or at least non-hateful).
Lest anyone mistake this for a hippie manifesto, Hendrix makes it clear that
the optimism and joy he advocates are not simply there for the taking, but
rather have to be earned through arduous struggle. His good cheer is the light
at the end of a very long tunnel: He writes, “Transcendental Black Metal is in
fact nihilism, however it is a double nihilism and a final nihilism, a once and
for all negation of the entire series of negations. With this final ‘No’ we
arrive at a sort of vertiginous Affirmation, an affirmation that is
white-knuckled, terrified, unsentimental, and courageous” (61).
This
manifesto has provoked a furor in the blogosphere, where it has been ridiculed
in the online forum Nuclear War Now! Productions as, “a weird and obnoxious
hybrid of verbal diarrhea and empowered hipster ignorance” (Blackmagoon 2011).
More thoughtful and substantive than these taunts, which merely object to the
jargon and do not engage with the subject matter, is Andrew White’s critique of
Hendrix in the postscript to Hideous Gnosis: “[Black metal] is
dark—bleak, angry, violent. This new form of black metal [Hendrix] proposes
sounds like something different altogether” (280). The whole point of black
metal as traditionally practiced is its uncompromisingly negative and
oppositional energy; for some, Hendrix’s worldview is simply too happy to
qualify as black metal. The reception of his work underscores the fact that
black metal isn’t just a sound, but a discourse, and anyone who dares to
critique that discourse is ostracized. His unusual background as a Columbia
philosophy major attracts resentment as well, since it fosters the image of an
affluent, pretentious outsider—though why such markers of elitism would
disqualify him from the scene is unclear, given the much more blatant arrogance
and social contempt that prevailed among the genre’s founding fathers, who were
also outsiders and rebels against the metal community of their time. It remains
to be seen whether Liturgy will ultimately be perceived as a black metal band,
and whether the claims of this essay will hold up over time, since the genre is
continuously redefined by musicians and audiences. So far, the young American
scene does seem significantly less hostile and angry than the Scandinavian
scene, and more interested in carrying on the legacy of ’60s countercultural
projects like radical environmentalism and peaceful anarchism than in burning
churches, worshiping ancestors, and fantasizing about battles in the north.
Whether
one accepts Hendrix’s vision or not, he at least deserves credit for bucking
the narrow-minded hermeticism and misanthropy that gave the scene its impetus
in the early 1990s but at this point risks leaving it to stagnate. Like the
music of female black metallers and others who do not fit the conventions of
the scene, his ideas and music represent an opportunity for fruitful
cross-fertilization with other points of view. His position makes for a
striking contrast with most of the other contributions: while they portray the
genre as a force of decay and destruction, as something inextricably bound up
with the decadent society it despises and doomed to go down with it, he thinks
the art form can go beyond that; through a dialectical process it can become a
theurgic and salvific force. His philosophical stance is reflected in Liturgy’s
performance style: he and fellow bandmates Bernard Gann, Tyler Dusenbury, and
Greg Fox eschew the menacing theatrics that usually accompany black metal performance,
such as horror movie-inspired costumes, corpse paint, demonic stage names, and
antagonistic shock-rock tactics in favor of unremarkable street clothing and a
modest, genial stage demeanor that belies their blogosphere reputation as
pompous elitists. Because of their indifference to the etiquette of black metal
as well as their wide range of non-metal musical influences, they are not
always accepted as a black metal band and are sometimes derided as interlopers
who casually appropriate black metal’s musical techniques without making a
commitment to the scene. In New York, at least, they headline at rock events as
often as metal ones. But if the band’s appearance is casual and unassuming, the
essay is not. High-flown and grandiloquent, it expresses a desire to change the
world—one DIY venue at a time.
While
Hendrix’s contribution represents black metal theoretical discourse in an
extroverted mode, Nicola Masciandaro’s “Anti-Cosmosis: Black Mahapralaya”
represents this discourse in a more introverted and mystical mode. He tries
both to find a theoretical language to talk about black metal and to use the
fundamental negativity of black metal itself as a way to enrich (or undercut)
the way scholarship is practiced today. In other words, his meditative essay
attempts both to theorize black metal and to make theoretical discourse more
indeterminate with an admixture of black metal esotericism. The ensuing
evasiveness is reminiscent of mid-twentieth-century critical theorists’ efforts
to deconstruct existing academic theory in order to make room for a different
kind of scholarship, but it also draws on older and richer traditions of
“unsaying” discourses, especially negative theology, which approaches the
ultimate truth by saying what it is not rather than what it is. The result is
indeed a different kind of scholarship from that which dominates academia
today; this essay and the book as a whole are as much works of art as of
erudition, full of fanciful illustrations and evocative, apparently candid
photographs from the symposium. The essays, which at first glance read like
impenetrable amalgams of creative writing and post-structuralist philosophy,
indulge in a level of obscurantism that is only possible among members of a
tiny occult sect who are unconcerned with courting a broader audience—in this
case, a broader academic or scene audience. If this approach has elicited some
unfortunate reactions from both the black metal scene (in the form of jeering,
bigoted comments posted in the blog associated with the project that were then
printed in the volume) and the academic press that refused to publish the book,
well, that’s inevitable, and probably in keeping with black metal’s
inscrutability.
The
mystical/cosmological approach of the book inevitably results in a certain
romanticization of black metal, albeit a more creative kind than that of most
metal scholarship, which tends to read politically progressive attitudes into
various metal subgenres. This volume romanticizes black metal not as a
political force, but rather as a force for expanding the possibilities of human
experience beyond the options afforded to us in everyday life. Using the common
tactic of asserting the superiority of one’s own aesthetic and lifestyle
preferences to those of the supposedly inane mainstream, Russo’s “Perpetue
Putesco,” for example, hints that the genre may be an antidote to the casual
consumerism of modern life (and, one assumes, to the Top 40 radio played in
commercial centers). He even suggests that it might be a gateway to a more
authentic, more obscene, and more sacred experience of reality. Rather than
taking the usual academic approach of describing a musical genre as it has
existed in the past and present, he and the other contributors primarily look
toward the future: by selectively bringing out certain of black metal’s latent
philosophical tendencies, they attempt to reclaim the music for some
still-to-be-defined, or never-to-be-defined, good.
This
book, one of the most intriguingly ambivalent attempts to redeem metal of its
sins, illustrates the fact that all metal scholarship is inevitably the product
of a fandom, and a very specific and limited one at that—a community of
scholars who want to burnish the intellectual credentials of this widely
denigrated and often anti-intellectual genre. Hideous Gnosis gives a
rich and layered account of what black metal represents for scholarly fans, but
the field awaits more ethnography to uncover what it means for other
listeners—not just the kindly left-leaning professor, but the frustrated
skinhead; not just the person who listens to the “kvlt” or “authentic” bands
that are the primary subject matter of this book (with the exception of the
heterodox Liturgy), but also the person who listens to the more commercially
successful bands that temper black metal with the despised conventions of pop.
The
most urgent task of metal scholarship in the immediate future indeed lies in
ethnography, because metal’s audience has changed dramatically over the past
twenty years. Gone are the days of the homogeneous audience described in early
sociologies. Today, metal’s fanbase includes people of many ethnicities and
nationalities, classes, education levels, religious beliefs, and political
views, and multiple genders and sexual orientations. These fans have been
little studied, and attention to their experiences would shed light not only on
them but also on metal culture in general, since scenes are defined largely by
their margins (and many of these fans do remain marginal). This process has recently
begun with great promise in Keith Kahn-Harris’ Extreme Metal: Music and
Culture on the Edge (2007), which gives considerable attention to the
Israeli scene, and Laina Dawes’ forthcoming What Are You Doing Here?: Black
Women in Metal, Hardcore and Punk (2012). Metal also needs more attention
from musicologists, of whom few other than Waksman currently have the expertise
to analyze a form of music so minimally notated and so reliant on
under-theorized musical techniques such as distortion. Finally, metal is quite
amenable to studies from other disciplines, even (or especially) those that
inhabit the fringes of academia: the speculative, philosophical approach of
Masciandaro and his fellow maverick English scholars is a novel way of thinking
about metal that opens up murky, alluring vistas of scholarship combined with
creative enterprises. Whatever the approach—sociological, musicological, or
philosophical—scholars need to suppress, or at least admit and temper, their
impulse to justify the music. This whitewashing strategy was arguably
defensible in the past when metal lacked sufficient prestige to be considered
worthy of academic study, but that is not the case anymore. Scholars today need
to acknowledge the fact that metal appeals because of its perversity, not in
spite of it. The time has come to give metal’s fascinating depravity its due.
References
Aites, Aaron
and Audrey Ewell. 2009. Until the Light Takes Us. Film. Variance Films.
Bataille,
Georges. 1988. Inner Experience, trans. Leslie Anne Boldt. Albany: State
University of New York Press.
Blackmagoon.
2011. Comment in the thread “None So Gay (Liturgy interview).” Nuclear War Now!
Productions webboard. March 8. Retrieved from
http://www.nwnprod.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=20928&sid=2ff71be36867617c50d73e1ddbcecf12
Dawes, Laina.
2012. What Are You Doing Here?: Black Women in Metal, Hardcore and Punk. New
York: Bazillion Points.
Gaines, Donna.
1991. Teenage Wasteland: Suburbia’s Dead End Kids. New York: Pantheon.
Halberstam,
Judith. 1998. Female Masculinity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press
Kahn-Harris,
Keith. 2007. Extreme Metal: Music and Culture on the Edge. Oxford and
New York: Berg.
_____. 2008.
Review of True Norwegian Black Metal, by Peter Beste. The New
Humanist,
vol. 123, issue
4. July/August 2008, Retrieved from
http://newhumanist.org.uk/1829/true-norwegian-black-metal-by-peter-beste
Lukács, Georg.
1971. “Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat,” in History and
Class Consciousness: Studies in
Marxist Dialectics. Trans. Rodney Livingstone. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Lilja, Esa.
2009. Theory and Analysis of Classic Heavy Metal Harmony. Helsinki:
IAML.
Nietzsche,
Friedrich. 1968. The Will to Power, trans. W. Kaufmann and R. J.
Hollingdale, ed. W. Kaufmann. New York: Vintage.
Pillsbury,
Glenn T. 2006. Damage Incorporated: Metallica and the Production of Musical
Identity. New York: Routledge.
Schmitt, Carl.
2007. Theory of the Partisan. Trans. G. L. Ulman. New York: Telos
Publishing.
Stosuy,
Brandon. 2010. “Haunting the Chapel No. 8: Interview with Varg Vikernes.”
Stereogum.com, October 3. Retrieved from
http://stereogum.com/295222/haunting-the-chapel-no-8/franchises/haunting-the-chapel/
Vikernes, Varg.
2004. “A Comment To “Vargsmål” And Other Books By Varg Vikernes.” December 15.
Retrieved from
http://www.burzum.org/eng/library/a_comment_to_vargsmal_and_other_books_by_varg_vikernes.shtml
Waksman, Steve.
1999. Instruments of Desire: The Electric Guitar and the Shaping of Musical
Experience. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Walser, Robert.
1993. Running with the Devil: Power, Gender, and Madness in Heavy Metal
Music. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University
Press.
Weinstein,
Deena. 1991. Heavy Metal: A Cultural Sociology. New York: Lexington
Books.
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
P.E.S.T. Schedule & Abstracts
P.E.S.T.
Philial
Epidemic Strategy
Tryst
Black Metal Theory Symposium
Date: Sunday 20 November 2011, 14.00-Close
Location: The Pint Bar, Eden Quay, Dublin, Ireland
2.00-2.15 Opening: Michael O’Rourke
2.15-3.15 PHILIAL
- 2.15-2.30 Zachary Price
- 2.30-2.45 Karin Sellberg
- 2.45-3.00 Nicola Masciandaro
- 3.00-3.15 Q & A
3.15-3.30 Drinking Break
3.30-4.15 EPIDEMIC
- 3.30-3.45 Aspasia Stephanou
- 3.45-4.00 Scott Wilson
- 4.00-4.15 Q & A
4.15-5.15 STRATEGY
- 4.15-4.30 Steven Shakespeare
- 4.30-4.45 Ben Woodard
- 4.45-5.00 Vincent Como
- 5.00-5.15 Q & A
5.15-5.45 Drinking Break
5.45-6.30 TRYST
- 5.45-6.00 Paul Ennis
- 6.00-6.15 Diarmuid Hester
- 6.15-6.30 Q & A
6.30-7.30 Refreshments
8.00-11.00 LIVE ACTS
Eternal Helcaraxe and Wound Upon Wound
ABSTRACTS
The Mutual Pestering of Black
Metal and Theory
Michael O’Rourke
If Black Metal
Theory in all its incipience and not-yet-here-ness involves a mutual
enblackening, then it also necessitates a mutual openness and pestering. That
is to say that theory must open itself up to its parasitical outside (which is always already inside) and black metal
too must open itself up to its own parasitical outside (which is always already inside). In order to
fashion, however provisionally, a black metal theory, a moving-back-and-forth
between black metal and theory, one needs what Deleuze called “intercessors”,
forces which come from the outside attracted by incipient conditions for their
coming in and feeding on. The forces which this paper activates—from diverse
fields including ecology, literary theory, art, politics, and philosophy— are a
series of cuttings-in or inter-scissions which create trouble, a thickening cloudiness, a smudging which bridges both
black metal and theory and their participations with a shared outside. These reverberations or resonances—openings
to, butcherings open by, the outside— are attuned to the temporality and politicality
(and by extension the ethical stakes) of a Black Metal Theory which is always
to-come.
“Destroy Your Life For Satan”:
A Buddhist Exploration of Black Metal Toward the Establishment of Necroyana
Zachary Price
The American
Nihilist Underground Society (ANUS) once published a piece sketching the
apparent affinity between death metal and Buddhism. The article recounts the
story of a man who, focusing all of his attention on death, learns the Buddha’s
open secret. “Only death is real.” Total awareness of death brings death metal
into a space where it may begin to realize the Buddhist path to enlightenment;
it is, after all, what set young Siddhartha on his path to become the Buddha.
Simply recognizing death is only the beginning, however. Without a liberatory
practice, death metal stalls and binds itself more deeply to illusion. Looking
is not enough. One must “taste and see.” Where its forbears have only gazed,
black metal insists on going. It relies on active dissolution, as evidenced in
common lyrical themes, production values, and even on-stage mutilation. In
Tibetan Buddhism, as well, many practices—for instance, the phowa, or
transference of consciousness—involve enacting a dissolution of the body, a
grinding down into is constituent elements, as well as a dissolution of the
mind. These overlapping methods demonstrate that black metal is a practice of death, just as Buddhism
essentially consists of the practice of death in meditation. Thus, it is also a
meditative practice. Practicing death, like all meditative practices, is a
liberatory process. It frees its practitioners from the illusion of life—which is
to say, it unearths and makes present the truth that we are always already
dying and rotting away. Therefore, black metal is akin to the yanas of Buddhist
practice, a vehicle for the realization of enlightenment. It is necroyana, the
vehicle of death itself, a body of practices against the body. A “massive
conspiracy against all life.” Not a diamond, but a femur pestle. A rope portal to the actualization of the
empty essence of mind. [References: “Destroy Your Life For Satan,” Mütiilation,
2001; Buddhism and Death Metal,” ; Psalm 34:8; “Massive
Conspiracy Against All Life,” Leviathan, 2008]
Dead
Gifts
Karin Sellberg
“Take thou some new infection to thy eye / And the rank poison of the
old will die” (Shakespeare, Romeo &
Juliet, 1.2.49-50). The Norwegian/Swedish word ‘gift’ connotes both married
bliss and poison. It also shares a common root with the English ‘gift’. The OED
tells us that a gift is something bestowed without the expectance of anything
in return. Giving, in its ideal form, is thus a pure expenditure or expression,
but as George Bataille reminds us gift exchange often harbours more complex
structures. Whether passionate or poisonous, most gifts are imbued with a vein
of sacrifice – and the lacerations following its sacral thrusts contract the
giver to his gift. Black Metal lore is full of sacrifices and ‘sacred’ gifts.
The most infamous example is possibly the suicide of Mayhem’s vocalist Dead
(Per Yngve Ohlin), after which the rest of the band members were said to have
feasted on his brains and made ‘special gifts’ out of fragments of his skull.
The brain stew was later claimed to be a false rumour, but the band has
confirmed the existence of skull amulets. Whether true or not, the myth of both
these omophagic philiations pose a number of interesting questions: is there a
particular allure to Dead’s discarded physical remains? What type of power are
the Dead Gifts invested with? Bataille and Reza Negarestani offer us a few
clues. Death is both contagious and cathartic. As several of the Mayhem members
attest to, Dead always saw himself as dead: “That is the reason he took that
name. He knew he would die” (Occultus), but in death Dead became something more
elevated and universal. He became the image of Death – its allegorical
counterfeit. As his bones were shattered by the force of the gunshot, his body
grew steadily more formless and molar. When Dead came to personify Death, Death
itself was split open. The Medieval saint Angela de Foligno recognises that the
ingestion of Death (in her case through a mouthful of leprous pus) opens her
body to Christ and infinity. Dead’s gifts of Death allow their recipients to
commune with transcendence.
On the Mystical Love of Black
Metal
Nicola Masciandaro
“Deep in the
shadows wings take to flight through clouds of chaos where stars die” (Inquisition,
“Across the Abyss Ancient Horns Bray,” Ominous
Doctrines of the Perpetual Mystical Macrocosm). “That which neither creates
nor is created . . . is classed among the impossibles, for its essence lies in
that it cannot be [cuius differentia est
non posse esse]” (John Scotus Eriugena, Periphyseon.
The love of black metal twists toward absolute cosmic exteriority along a
mystical path of intensive inversion. Ordinate mysticism takes an inward and upward path to God as the source and goal of everything,
withdrawing from the exterior phenomenal world in order to ascend beyond it to
the One in a movement that is anabatic, apophatic, and anagogic (Plotinus, Enneads, 4.8.1; Augustine, Confessions, 7.10,16; Pseudo-Dionysius, Mystical Theology, 1.1). The love of
black metal, reversely and contrarily, leads downwards and outwards
into a paradoxically disordered and multiple cosmos that is no less divine,
pursuing a musical path that is catabatic, cataphatic, and apogogic (a path,
however, that necessarily twists these terms according to its own essential
negativity). Where music traditionally aims to mimetically ascend to
hyper-central divine truth through the harmony of the celestial spheres, black
metal’s noisy anti-modern sonic drive coordinately plunges into the depths only
to release and radically fly upon the infinite centrifugal power or negative
cosmic wind of sound itself. Crucially, this distinction, between the ordered
mystical love of God and the disordered mysticism that love of black metal
inescapably is, is not a pure opposition. Like the Petrine Cross that at once
marks the temporally separate twin foundations of the terrestrial ecclesia and
the heavy acosmic kvlt, black metal love is a most intimate transposition of
its spiritual precursor, a dissemblance that exacerbates and intensifies the
still, unmoving point of identity with what it inverts. This point, the secret
moment or punctum around which black
metal assemblies anarchically gather, is perversely legible in moments of black
metal complicity with essential ‘disordering’ counter-movements within medieval
mystical discourse, for instance, Richard of St. Victor’s representation of the
God-enflamed soul as spontaneously sinking
into the divine will like liquefied black metal (On the Four Degrees of Violent Charity), Mechthild of Magdeburg’s
exaltation of the soul’s descent into the night of separation: “O blissful
distance from God, how lovingly am I connected with you!”, and Meister Eckhart’s
prayer to be rid of God. Arguing that the modern love of black metal is,
willy-nilly, a profound and fresh form of mysticism, a desperate contemplation
of the divine manifesting the ‘desire to be everything’ (Bataille), this
lecture will demonstrate, with special reference to the works of Inquisition
and John Scotus Eriugena, how black metal and mysticism are lovingly united in
the dark pestilential space of excessive and compound negativity, a new realm
of the not not God.
Contagion
and Solipsism
Aspasia Stephanou
This paper will examine the possibility of contagious proliferations in
Black Metal, as well as the vampire/monstrous self as an enclosed capsule at
the centre of the black metal universe. While black metal narratives open up
the self to horror and epidemic contagion, dissolving boundaries between the
self and other, between the self as a good meal for the other, at the same time
the monstrous persona of black metal refuses to be eaten or eat with the other,
sustaining thus the boundaries between a dominating self and a submissive
other. Such a relationship is always imagined in terms of a masculine voice and
imaginary self who invites the female other, in order to deny her her own jouissance, retaining thus his integrity
and wholeness. As Joan Copjec writes, the vampire represents our overproximity
to the object of the breast, the objet
petit a, which the vampire now possesses but as a source of jouissance (36). For Copjec, vampires
are male and their victims are female. Similarly, the vampiric black metal self
dominates the female other, even when such contagious transactions occur,
re-establishing thus limits and hierarchies. If the vampire messes up meal and
its economies, as Negarestani argues, it also functions as a fictional prop to
conjure up the horror of pestilence through the masculine prerogative to
consume without the possibility of exchange or openness towards death mess and
necrophilic contamination.
Musca
amusica and the sound of Satan’s
ascension
Scott Wilson
“Halo of Flies Over
My Head / I am decaying Satan’s Wrath / The one to walk planet earth / alone / Spreading
disease, death and war” (Impaled Nazarene, ‘Halo of Flies’ All That You Fear [2004]). “Attractive
to the flies ... I am their mephitic trough ... a buzzing which engulfs all ...
Through compound eyes / I envision eternity” (Lugubrum, ‘Attractive to Flies’, De Vette Cueken [2004]). Flies are a
frequent trope in both black and death metal. For the latter, buzzing flies
pullulating over a rotting corpse lyrically figures death metal’s pulverizing
a-subjective affections of the body; for the former, flies are related to a
metaphysical problem bound up not so much to the paradoxical notion of the
death of God but the death and deification of Satan. The ultimate reference
(perhaps since Iron Maiden and across numerous genres) is to Satan as ‘Lord of
the Flies’, or as Malkuth put it, ‘Great Black Goat God (Lord of the Flies)’
(1994). But as this reference to Golding’s famous novel suggests, Satan is
already, here, a rotting animal’s head: the sacrificial offering to the Beast
misperceived as the Beat itself. Or rather become
the beast through the hideous teeming acephalic noise of the flies that swarm
about its decapitated head. The process of self-identification and
self-transcendence that holds the God-Satan-Man triad together is transformed
through parasitic consumption. Flies, not Man, maketh the Beast, but first
through turning the flesh into ‘a mephitic trough’, a Styx of digestive liquid’
(Lugubrum) in which ‘Transformed man [is] dethroned’, Nominon, ‘Hordes of Flies’
(2005). For Nominon, then, the process of complete post-parasitical
transformation – ‘Innate insects part of me /Parasite inside eating me / Host
of flies born inside – sees the Satanic ‘Beast’ (the satanic multiple)
resurrected from the swarming darkness of base matter where death has no
dominion: ‘Absence of life I am the lord
of flies’. Companion species, no doubt, since the migration of homo sapiens
from Africa, musca domestica have lodged in the margins of human
civilization, incubating and pupating in its shit and garbage, feeding on
wounds and rotting flesh, defecating and vomiting waste matter teeming in
deadly bacteria and viruses: typhoid, cholera, dysentery, tuberculosis. In
black metal’s buzzing, its musca amusica,
flies are both the locus of amusical
ex-sistence and figure of Satan’s divine inexistence and ascension. ‘Through
compound eyes / I envision eternity’.
Into the
Vomitarium: Diseased Sacraments
Steven Shakespeare
Thomas
Aquinas’ Summa Theologica has been
likened to a ‘cathedral’ of thought. It is striking, then, that its final
article deals with sacramental dilemmas such as: what happens if the
eucharistic host decays, or is eaten by mice? What happen if the priest goes
insane during mass, or throws up after receiving communion? An image is
spawned: at the consummation of the cathedral’s mass, a priest lurches outside
to vomit the infected host. Satanic black metal pursues this corruption of the
holy through scenes of violation, deliberately perverting sacramental imagery.
This paper traces the ambiguous relationship it maintains with Christian
eucharistic theology, focusing particularly on the work of Deathspell Omega. In
their hands, black metal becomes a tool for pursuing the kenosis of God to its
ultimate end in an identification with diseased flesh, a supplement which
ungrounds the sanctity and wholeness of the divine. Whilst their earlier work
is still encumbered with a normative misogyny which replicates the failure of
Christian orthodoxy to follow the logic of incarnation to its decaying end,
from 2004, Deathspell Omega realise the strangely liberating corruption of
transubstantiation (the ‘of’ to be taken utterly ambiguously). Emblematic of
this shift is the appropriation, on ‘Diabolicus Absconditus’, of Bataille’s
image of the whore as God. The paper
ends by turning to the queer theology of Marcella Althaus-Reid to further
subvert the unholy alliance of narratives of sanctity and rape. Althaus-Reid
affirms an unstable, scavenger God, constructed through the material, sexual
lives of the excluded, celebrating “a Eucharist in which Christ’s
transubstantiation depends on a discarded piece of rotten bread.” In this
encounter, orthodox Satanic mimesis of Christianity becomes, neither echo nor
reversal, but an intimate, putrefying communicatio
idiomatum.
Folding a Cadaverous Scream: The Disharmonious Flesh
of Recombinant Horror
Ben Woodard
This essay aims to harvest a
philosophical provenance for recombinant horror – a particular form of body
horror (or biohorror) that focuses on contagions that rearrange bodies both
internally and externally with examples being Dead Space, Resident
Evil, Parasite Eve, and others. This form of horror I argue indexes the
strange mathesis of Leibniz (and Deleuze’s reading and Negarestani’s response
to that reading), Nick Land and Bataille’s discussion of the Labrynth, as well
the tension between biological and architectural models of thought in Kant’s
archtectonic. Black Metal will be stitched through this form of horror through
the odd complicity between music and architecture in Bataille’s pornographic
rallying against the former, Land and Negarestani’s howling inorganics, and the
sickly biological upsetting the prestablished structure of Kant’s thought. By
looking at instances of biohorror in music I will attempt to discern how
lyrical approaches coalesce or fail to demonstrate the nonstructural but
structure-dependent horror of recombinant horror. In the end the guiding
question will be if the sickly noise of the inorganic can be sufficiently
absorbed by the intentional sonic and how this informs the mediation between
pattern in flow in the gross inevitability of a dark vitalism, in which
fecundity and negativity are inseparable, in which the body is twisted into a
labyrinth, in which the inorganic screams with the pain of its self-induced
flailing.
Tune In, Turn On, Curse Out
Vincent Como
The artwork/imagery
being used to promote this, the third Black Metal Theory Symposium, is from a
series of 23 works based on ancient Defixiones, or Curse Tablets, which apply
an invocation—for good or ill—toward another party most often with whom you are
either besotted, or who has wronged you in some matter of business or personal
relation. In speaking about the works
in this Hexe series, we will summarize the traditional role of the curse
tablet and how these particular works are constructed in order to achieve
similar results through a structural analysis and an exploration of their
material properties in relation to Hermetic traditions. This will then allow us
to move beyond the physical object of power and discuss intention and the
psychology of belief as an entity in its own right, which leads directly into
the overarching theme of PEST. One’s complicity with the complex and
layered structure that is belief is such that when encountering the intentions
of another, it ultimately challenges the insular domain of one’s very being;
destroying the barrier of the self, and forcing an engagement with the realm of
an other. This, then, turns virtually
all human interaction into a psychic attack being perpetrated by and upon
everyone at all times. Existence, as we will come to understand, is a
relentless barrage of intentions, ideas and the surplus of decaying belief systems
being recycled from the beginning of time to the present. This perpetual
assault goes predominantly unnoticed until it is tapped into and channeled by
an object, person, or collective group, at which point the focused intention
may cut through the omnipresent universal static to fulfill its purpose, to
cause affect upon a receiver.
“The Hopeless
Soul Keeps Mating”: Notes on Black Metal and Contemporary Fiction
Diarmuid Hester
This contribution considers the recent interest in black metal amongst
writers of experimental American fiction. Utilising a conceptual framework
derived from Deleuze’s reading of Spinoza, we will demonstrate that the
conduction of black metal themes, cadences and intonation through fiction
conforms to the Deleuzo-Spinozist outline of a disagreeable or poisonous
relation. Black metal’s encounter with writing does not bring forth
amplification, accretion or combination to form a higher power but is, rather,
corrupting and pestilential: decomposing and diminishing what we might call
fiction’s subordinate –and therefore constituent– relations e.g. the range and
affective capacity of character, plot, syntax, etc. This reflection obliges us
to reassess the merit of a Deleuzo-Spinozist ethology and to pursue the
vitalist prejudice which circulates at the very heart of this system.
Bleak Theory
Paul J. Ennis
In this paper I set out to show how contemporary continental realisms,
especially the more nihilistic strands of speculative realism, are not quite
black, but bleak. I tease out this subtle difference from the launching pad of
Eugene Thacker’s recent monograph In the Dust of This Planet which
includes a sustained engagement with black metal theory. From there I intend to
enter into a discussion of the theme of the impersonal and the unhuman as it
manifests throughout the post-Kantian tradition (with an emphasis on Kant,
Hegel, Heidegger, and Meillassoux, etc.). In the end, my hope is to demonstrate
that continental philosophy has always been if not black, then a little bit
bleak, and so finds a natural ally in black metal theory.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)